karaf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jamie goodyear (Resolved) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (KARAF-1086) Create Kar for Karaf demos
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:16:58 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Jamie goodyear resolved KARAF-1086.

    Resolution: Fixed

The karaf 3.0 demos have been updated to kar format.
> Create Kar for Karaf demos
> --------------------------
>                 Key: KARAF-1086
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1086
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: karaf-demo
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Jamie goodyear
>            Assignee: David Jencks
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>         Attachments: Zrzut ekranu 2011-12-13 (godz. 16.53.54).png
> From IRC discussion:
> {code}
> djencks: right so I think the next thing would be to start working on a kar project for
the demos [18:15]
> jamieg: I'm going to split my JIRA for the kar demo in two -- one for the features-maven
plugin and the other for the karaf-maven plugin. They approach creating kars differently [18:15]
> djencks: we could have a kar per demo or one that installs all the demos 
> yes.... AFAIK the features-maven-plugin doesn't actually work to create kars 
> which is why I've been hoping 3.0 could be released sooner rather than later	[18:16]
> jamieg:	very true, but it should according to the docs	[18:17]
> djencks: and, everything I've been saying is only about trunk/3.0....	[18:17]
> jamieg:	Oh yes, that i assumed :) I wouldn't change the packaging of demos on a micro
> 2.x assemblies will pretty much stay as they are	[18:18]
> djencks: I think it would be great to find out if the manual instructions are correct
and comprehensible enough for someone other than me to set up a working kar project to install
the demos but if you like I could come up with at least a start	[18:19]
> jamieg: Please feel free to jump in :) 
> djencks: I've been learning the kar functionality from the docs and from chatting with
you ;) 
> and others	[18:20]
> djencks: ok do you think it would be better to have each demo individually installable
or have all the demos in one kar?	[18:20]
> jamieg: good question :)	[18:21]
> djencks:if we decided "individually" we could have a demo archetype but it ends up with
almost twice as many projects	[18:22]
> jamieg: or if we go for 'all' its simple at least 
> djencks: do we gain anything from individual demos? 
> djencks: an demo archtype could be useful for custom distro builders 
> ... 
> djencks: perhaps all for 3.0, then individual for 3.1? 
> djencks: gets things done fast for 3.0 then build our better functionality for 3.1?	[18:22]
> djencks: I'll start with an "all" and see how it goes	[18:24]
> jamieg: (just trying to manage feature creep - a lot of people are really calling for
3.0.0)	[18:24]
> djencks: (in particular me :-)	[18:24]
> jamieg:	hehe	[18:24]
> djencks: ok, good, we have a plan.... have to go now for a bit... thanks!
> {code}

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message