karaf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andreas Pieber (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (KARAF-7) features/uninstall behaves different in version selection than features/install
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2011 07:15:58 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andreas Pieber updated KARAF-7:
-------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 2.1.3

needs to be validated if this still affects latest versions

> features/uninstall behaves different in version selection than features/install
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-7
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.3
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>
> When using "features/install xxx" without a version info, than it takes the latest available
version.
> When using "features/uninstall xxx" without a version info, than it complains if the
version isn't 0.0.0. 
> Lars Heinemann added a comment - 11/Feb/09 02:16 AM - edited
> Uninstalling a feature which contains other features which contain bundles will end up
in having the most top feature in state uninstalled but the sub-features and components are
no touched.
> For example:
> Feature MyFeature
>   | --- MySubFeature1
>   |         | --- Bundle A
>   |         | --- Bundle B
>   | --- MySubFeature2
>   |         | --- Bundle C
>   |         | --- Bundle D
> When uninstalling the feature "MyFeature" the result is this:
> [uninstalled]     MyFeature
> [ installed ]     MySubFeature1
> [ installed ]     MySubFeature2
> This is imho not the correct behaviour.
> [ Show » ]
> Lars Heinemann added a comment - 11/Feb/09 02:16 AM - edited Uninstalling a feature which
contains other features which contain bundles will end up in having the most top feature in
state uninstalled but the sub-features and components are no touched. For example:
> Feature MyFeature
>   | --- MySubFeature1
>   |         | --- Bundle A
>   |         | --- Bundle B
>   | --- MySubFeature2
>   |         | --- Bundle C
>   |         | --- Bundle D
> When uninstalling the feature "MyFeature" the result is this:
> [uninstalled]     MyFeature
> [ installed ]     MySubFeature1
> [ installed ]     MySubFeature2
> This is imho not the correct behaviour.
> [ Permlink | Edit | Delete | « Hide ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 09:26 AM
> The "features/uninstall xxx" should automatically select the version of the installed
features, else throw an error.
> [ Show » ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 09:26 AM The "features/uninstall xxx" should
automatically select the version of the installed features, else throw an error.
> [ Permlink | Edit | Delete | « Hide ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 10:59 AM
> For the uninstall stuff, I'm not sure. Currently we do not keep track of features installed
as dependencies. i guess we'd have to.
> If a feature is installed as a dependency, it should be removed if no longer used because
the feature having a dependency on it has been uninstalled.
> [ Show » ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 10:59 AM For the uninstall stuff, I'm not
sure. Currently we do not keep track of features installed as dependencies. i guess we'd have
to. If a feature is installed as a dependency, it should be removed if no longer used because
the feature having a dependency on it has been uninstalled.
> [ Permlink | Edit | Delete | « Hide ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 11:34 AM
> Raised a different issue for automaticaly selecting the right version when uninstalling.
> [ Show » ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 11:34 AM Raised a different issue for automaticaly
selecting the right version when uninstalling.
> [ Permlink | Delete | « Hide ]
> Chris Custine added a comment - 11/Feb/09 12:51 PM
> I noticed the same uninstall issue (not removing dependency features). It seems like
we will have to do a considerable amount of dependency tracking to get this to work properly
and there are some really difficult conflict resolution issues to consider. I think there
is definitely some room to improve the features functionality but I am thinking this should
probably be pushed to a later release.
> [ Show » ]
> Chris Custine added a comment - 11/Feb/09 12:51 PM I noticed the same uninstall issue
(not removing dependency features). It seems like we will have to do a considerable amount
of dependency tracking to get this to work properly and there are some really difficult conflict
resolution issues to consider. I think there is definitely some room to improve the features
functionality but I am thinking this should probably be pushed to a later release.
> [ Permlink | Edit | Delete | « Hide ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 02:13 PM
> Yeah, I fully agree. Let's move that one for 1.2.0 and get 1.1.0 out asap.
> [ Show » ]
> Guillaume Nodet added a comment - 11/Feb/09 02:13 PM Yeah, I fully agree. Let's move
that one for 1.2.0 and get 1.1.0 out asap.
> [ Permlink | Delete | « Hide ]
> Lars Heinemann added a comment - 11/Feb/09 09:29 PM
> moved to version 1.2.0

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

Mime
View raw message