karaf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ioannis Canellos (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (KARAF-106) Provide a more minimal / static disitrbution of karaf
Date Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:08:49 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12891545#action_12891545
] 

Ioannis Canellos commented on KARAF-106:
----------------------------------------

As noted in bullet 6. The folder etc is split in two new folders: etc-normal and etc-minimal.

This will eventually break some unit tests, that copy resources from the assembly folder (e.g
AdminServiceImplTest in the Admin Core module). 

That can be easily fixed, however I would need some feedback, on how acceptable is splitting
etc folder and if the split is acceptable, then which of the 2 etc folders should be used
for unit testing.



> Provide a more minimal / static disitrbution of karaf
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-106
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>         Attachments: patchfile.txt
>
>
> Servers that are mostly static (thinking about activemq, directory, james, etc...) usually
don't require the deploy folder, the admin stuff and all.
> I think we should provide a slightly more lightweight distribution without the added
bits.  For example, ssh could be added through a feature, but not included by default, etc...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message