From dev-return-13232-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@karaf.apache.org Tue Dec 4 21:23:48 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 66662180652 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:23:48 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 87736 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2018 20:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 87719 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2018 20:23:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:23:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 72139C1F62 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:23:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9g2-cbFjFPt for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5FDDA610E4 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:23:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: 82.238.224.4 Received: from [192.168.134.48] (bre91-1-82-238-224-4.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.224.4]) (Authenticated sender: jb@nanthrax.net) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3176FFF807 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Consider KARAF-5934 for Karaf 4.2.2? To: dev@karaf.apache.org References: <5b77fde4-daad-35c2-f357-69233722cad9@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-Baptiste_Onofr=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <4af365dc-1842-c2af-2256-0303cb8e5067@nanthrax.net> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:23:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5b77fde4-daad-35c2-f357-69233722cad9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Eric, I just tried the following scenario: 1. With Karaf 4.2.2-SNAPSHOT freshly built, I created an instance with: instance:create test instance:start test instance:connect test 2. I dropped a bundle in the test instance deploy folder. I can see the fileinstall "trigger" in the log: 2018-12-04 21:21:43,375 | INFO | nces/test/deploy | fileinstall | 10 - org.apache.felix.fileinstall - 3.6.4 | Started bundle: file:/home/jbonofre/Workspace/karaf/assemblies/apache-karaf/target/apache-karaf-4.2.2-SNAPSHOT/instances/test/deploy/commons-lang-2.6.jar So, it looks good to me. Regards JB On 02/12/2018 20:15, Eric Lilja wrote: > Hi, is it possible to consider including KARAF-5934 for 4.2.2? I saw it > was just tentatively postponed to 4.2.3. > > Also, is the deploy folder enabled by default? I downloaded the binary > distribution (version 4.2.1), and created a new instance with feature > scr enabled. Everything else vanilla. I put a bundle in the deploy > folder but it doesn't get installed, no interesting output from log:tail > either, so no failures. Just like the directory was not monitored at all > (I did use the deploy directory in the instance I created). > > Furthermore, output from scr:list seems to lack line breaks. This is > under Windows, with Cygwin (Mintty) as terminal. Also tried with > TakeCommand under Windows, which used to work really well with Karaf, > but when one does bundle:list -s -t 0 for example, a lot columns > contains only ?-characters (question marks). Also scr:list looks bad > under it. > > - Eric L >