karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: FYI, OSGi Features RFP
Date Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:36:27 GMT
That's a fair comment.

However, we can still maintain our feature model, not following the specification.

Regards
JB

On 04/09/2018 12:00 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> 2018-04-09 11:42 GMT+02:00 Francois Papon <francois.papon@openobject.fr>:
> 
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> Can you explain why you think it's not a good thing for Karaf ?
>>
> 
> Because from an OSGi pov, it's not really possible to involve the Karaf
> community, so if the community is not fully involved, I don't see how it
> could be beneficial to it.   The OSGi Alliance is not an open source
> organization, so things are developed internally amongst the OSGi members,
> and you have to be an OSGi member in order to have any saying (we'll you
> can always raise issues but you have no saying, really).
> 
> My fear is that we'll end up with a trimmed down version of what Karaf
> actually supports (hopefully not without incompatible things) and that we
> will be pressured to support it, and it may lead us to directions we may
> have not pursued otherwise.
> 
> For example, blueprint is under specified and we have to work harder in
> order to add things that are outside the standard.  Though, given the OSGi
> Alliance is somewhat abandoning blueprint, I think my next move on this
> area will be to get rid of the standard and just use an aries specific
> schema instead (enhanced, but without having to use a difference schema for
> the extensions).
> 
> But I hope I'll be proved wrong.
> 
> 
>>
>> François
>>
>>
>> Le 09/04/2018 à 13:35, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
>>> I was not in any way aware of this RFP and I'm not part of the process,
>> but
>>> this looks really inspired from Karaf Features at least.
>>> The author, David B. is a Karaf committer, so he may be able to comment
>> on
>>> what he has in mind.
>>>
>>> Having said that, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for Karaf, but we'll
>>> see. Hopefully things will go well this time, but I've already seen
>> several
>>> things go wrong at the OSGi EEG...
>>>
>>> Guillaume
>>>
>>> 2018-04-09 11:07 GMT+02:00 Serge Huber <shuber@jahia.com>:
>>>
>>>> Interesting ! Is it planned to be based on Karaf Features model ?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>   Serge...
>>>>
>>>> Serge Huber
>>>> CTO & Co-Founder
>>>> T +41 22 361 3424
>>>> 9 route des Jeunes | 1227 Acacias | Switzerland
>>>> jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/>
>>>> SKYPE | LINKEDIN <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergehuber> | TWITTER
>>>> <https://twitter.com/sergehuber> | VCARD
>>>> <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/HuberSerge.vcf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained
>> and
>>>> to discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for
>>>> Digital Transformation.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> See https://github.com/osgi/design/blob/master/rfps/rfp-
>>>> 0188-Features.pdf
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message