Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE92200BA1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6C6AA160AEC; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B4CA7160AE5 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7033 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2016 09:58:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 7021 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2016 09:58:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 225881A0087 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.28 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s02UMPJ30MTB for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3CDF95F30E for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter46-d.gandi.net (mfilter46-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.177]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2577A812C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter46-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter46-d.gandi.net (mfilter46-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynaNDzKptVGR for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 194.78.212.149 Received: from [10.2.6.19] (149.212-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.212.149]) (Authenticated sender: jb@nanthrax.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC8EBA8104 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: The future of gemini-blueprint To: dev@karaf.apache.org References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-Baptiste_Onofr=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:58:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:58:18 -0000 +1 Regards JB On 10/17/2016 11:33 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider > deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support. > > I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's > following configuration of remote repositories: > > org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \ >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=spring.ebr.release, >> \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring.ebr.external, >> \ >> http://zodiac.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=gemini, \ >> >> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots@id=sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring-ebr-repository@snapshots@noreleases >> > > 4 repositories are SpringSource ones and FAQ on their site says: > > *What is the current status of the repository?* >> >> The repository is frozen but will remain accessible *until at least 1 >> September 2014*. See http://www.eclipse.org/ebr/ for information >> regarding the Eclipse Bundle Recipes project to which users of the >> SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository should transition. >> > > These 4 (3 for non-snapshots) repositories are queried during all > Maven/Aether resolutions. > > Maybe it's time to remove gemini-blueprint? What do you think? > > best regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbonofre@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com