karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: AW: Feedback for Canceling Decanter 1.1.0
Date Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:20:52 GMT
I will add a note for sure.

As I said to Oli, all depends which kind of production we are talking 
about ;)
A large scale production, sharing elasticsearch and kibana with 
different middleware, I fully agree.
A medium scale production, or only monitoring solution for Karaf itself, 
I think people don't care: they want something easy, straight forward, 
all in Karaf.
So, maybe we have a biased see on production regarding our experience 
with this layer ;)

The good point with Decanter is that we address both ;)


On 04/04/2016 05:15 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
> On 04.04.2016 10:13, Oliver Wulff wrote:
>> Hi JB
>> What you bring is right but users may have different standpoint: lot of
>> people just wants to use decanter as a blackbox solution with
>> elasticsearch and kibana embedded.
>> I understand this point but we should at least mention in the
>> documentation that it's not the recommended approach to emebed an
>> elasticsearch node within a JVM.
>> Thanks
>> Oli
> I fully agree to add a warning. For demos it makes sense to embed es and
> kibana but for production it is not a good idea.
> I think for production it might make sense to co locate an elastic
> search node on the same machine but I would not do it in the same vm.
> Christian

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message