Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALTeT_=-y7X5cDHkyiQNhE8pr0eVg+RL8rTTeg2VWbKBY5QFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALTeT_k+E47pGg+bGAYCpL9Hk7iVsHE71WZQ7LUeSHUqq2WW0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<56F2F7DF.1010206@nanthrax.net>
	<CALTeT_=-y7X5cDHkyiQNhE8pr0eVg+RL8rTTeg2VWbKBY5QFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:24:42 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAG5yKK-azGSf9v1CdAVXXfd4MyXMdG61i1j65fE2fzg-t=iirw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Introduction
From: Morgan Hautman <morgan.hautman@gmail.com>
To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb03a0a7a1671052ec58080

--047d7bb03a0a7a1671052ec58080
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello David,

Welcome to the Karaf community!

Regards,
Morgan

2016-03-24 3:44 GMT+01:00 David Orme <djo@coconut-palm-software.com>:

> Hi JB et al:
>
> Inline.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9 <jb@nanthrax.n=
et>
> wrote:
>
> > to be clear: what's the purpose of your e-mail ?
> >
>
> Thanks for asking.
>
> As a shop, we're pretty new to Clojure, so initially we took the path of
> least resistance and deployed applications as uberjars.
>
> Now we're ready to grow up.  :-)
>
> And basically I think that a dynamic language like Clojure needs a dynami=
c
> modular runtime in order to deliver maximum benefit.
>
> So while I was writing the prior email there were two categories of thing=
s
> in the back of my mind:
>
> 1) Things I really need to do to make our existing portfolio of
> applications more maintainable, modular, serviceable, etc.
>
> 2) Features that would make the difference between getting the job done a=
nd
> really fulfilling the potential of putting dynamic (or dynamically
> compiled) languages inside a dynamic runtime--both at development and at
> runtime.
>
> But experience tells me that the most effective implementation of #2 will
> require a community, in every sense of that word.  So I wanted to see if
> this particular community finds the vision I attempted to articulate
> compelling and in any case to simply introduce myself since it seems
> there's a good chance I might be hanging out here awhile either way.  :-)
>
> The detailed technical responses are appreciated.   Unfortunately, my
> response will need to wait until tomorrow.  Look forward to writing more.=
..
>

--047d7bb03a0a7a1671052ec58080--