karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sascha Vogt <sascha.v...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal - Lightweight standalone remote OSGi implementation for karaf-cellar
Date Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:31:29 GMT

Am 16.02.2016 um 23:33 schrieb Christian Schneider:
> Yes. To have double the performance in a binary transport is also what I
> would expect.
> I also think the performance you measured for CXF should be fine.
> I wonder why ECF and Amdatu would be so much slower. Maybe there is just
> something wrong with the setup.
After looking into the implementation, Amdatu does not use connection
pooling for the HTTP connection. So each service invocation creates a
new connection to the other side which is directly closed after that.
That probably explains its poor results.

For ECF I think it's best when we share our simple test code and for
Scott to have a look at it :)


View raw message