Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B1F410E3F for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63634 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 14:46:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 63596 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 14:46:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 26397 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2015 14:34:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of yogu13@gmail.com does not designate 162.253.133.43 as permitted sender) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 07:33:45 -0700 (MST) From: yogu13 To: dev@karaf.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <53856B30.9040306@nanthrax.net> <1401387010024-4033328.post@n3.nabble.com> <53878301.7070707@nanthrax.net> <1422693859197-4038161.post@n3.nabble.com> <54CCAB21.8010104@nanthrax.net> <1422863863557-4038190.post@n3.nabble.com> <54CF3E20.40400@nanthrax.net> <1423138252164-4038327.post@n3.nabble.com> <1424350914900-4038631.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Were you guys still interested in adopting Log4j2 for your logging system? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Achim, Karaf supports / includes pax logging.. Pax logging has implemented the support for log4j2..IMO if karaf includes pax logging then it should be including the support for all implemented logging flavours and let user decide which implementation to use and not be selective. Regards, -Yogesh On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Achim Nierbeck [via Karaf] < ml-node+s922171n4038632h37@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't remember that we decided to switch to log4j2 as service impl for > the karaf logging so this is quite intentional. > If you rather have another logging available you'll need to change that in > your custom distribution. > > regards, Achim > > > 2015-02-19 14:01 GMT+01:00 yogu13 <[hidden email] > >: > > > JB, > > > > Looks like karaf didnt include the pax-logging-log4j2 feature as part of > > their asslembly. As part of the feature file I only see > > > > > > > > > > start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/${pax.logging.version} > > > > > > > start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-service/${pax.logging.version} > > > > > log4j2 and pax-logging-log4j2 bundles are missing. > > > > file being referred -> [karaf.git] -> assemblies -> features -> > framework > > -> src -> main -> feature -> feature.xml > > > > Do we need to raise a JIRA for this? > > > > Let me know.. > > > > Regards, > > -Yogesh > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038631.html > > Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web Committer & > Project Lead > blog > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038632.html > To unsubscribe from Were you guys still interested in adopting Log4j2 for > your logging system?, click here > > . > NAML > > -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038634.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.