karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giuseppe Gerla <giuseppe.ge...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Uninstall bundle and package dependency
Date Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:15:43 GMT
Just to add some information.
When I use the global refresh karaf removes the bundle from the cache
folder...




Regards
Giuseppe

2015-01-09 10:55 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>:

> Looks like we got an issue with the refresh command, though it seems to be
> the other way round, compared to the issue we had with Karaf 3.0.x.
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2015-01-09 10:50 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Gerla <giuseppe.gerla@gmail.com>:
>
> > Thanks Achim
> > if I do a global refresh bundle 88 goes in not resolved state.
> >
> > The same behavior if I use web console. Using "Refresh packages" button
> > from specific bundle page don't update the bundle state. If I use the
> > "Refresh packages" button from the /system/console/bundles page all works
> > fine.
> >
> > I'd like to investigate what happen if I update a single bundle using
> > "Install/Update" functionality of webconsole.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > Giuseppe
> >
> >
> > 2015-01-09 9:46 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi Giuseppe,
> > >
> > > this is rather strange that it works with features, but not with the
> > > refresh command.
> > > OTH we had an issue with it till Karaf 3.0.2, if you just do a refresh
> > > (without the id)
> > > it doesn't refresh the complete container as it's supposed to.
> > > Did you refresh the explicit bundle, or just call bundle:refresh?
> > >
> > > regards, Achim
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-01-08 22:04 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Gerla <giuseppe.gerla@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Achim
> > > > thanks for your answers.
> > > > The problem is that after refresh 88, bundle is still in Active
> state.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see bundle 87 in the list of bundles installed, but there is
> > > still
> > > > the data/cache/bundle87 folder. This folder disappears when I close
> > karaf
> > > > with shutdown command.
> > > >
> > > > I make also another test. I create a feature for "Sample Dependency
> > > Bundle"
> > > > and another for "Sample Dependent Bundle" that install also the other
> > > > feature.
> > > > In this case if I uninstall the "Sample Dependency Bundle" feature
> > Karaf
> > > > remove the bundle from cache folder and refresh correctly the state
> of
> > > > "Sample Dependent Bundle" in not resolved.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Giuseppe
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2015-01-08 20:27 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > actually I didn't look at it until now.
> > > > > I think there might be some sort of race on that actual procedure
> > > there.
> > > > > How about retrying with the following scenario.
> > > > >
> > > > > Install 87
> > > > > Install 88
> > > > >
> > > > > uninstall 87
> > > > > refresh 88, should be in non-resolved state after that
> > > > >
> > > > > install 89
> > > > > refresh 88, after that it should be wired to 89 again.
> > > > >
> > > > > regards, Achim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2015-01-08 18:49 GMT+01:00 Cristiano Costantini <
> > > > > cristiano.costantini@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Achim,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you look at the file attached to Giuseppe's message, even
if
> you
> > > > > refresh
> > > > > > to bundle 88 ( karaf@root> refresh 88 ) the bundle still
> resolves
> > > the
> > > > > > package import on the old and uninstalled bundle 87 instead
of
> > bundle
> > > > 89
> > > > > > (anyhow please note that bundle 89  is the same bundle,
> uninstalled
> > > and
> > > > > > installed again, the Jar is not recompiled).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shouldn't bundle 88 start using imports from bundle 89 after
the
> > > > explicit
> > > > > > refresh?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you and regards,
> > > > > > Cristiano
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Il giorno Thu Jan 08 2015 at 18:18:21 Achim Nierbeck <
> > > > > > bcanhome@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this is the desired behavior as per OSGi - Spec. Until
you do a
> > > > refresh
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > bundle 88 it will keep the references to the uninstalled
> bundle.
> > > > > > > The deploy folder is watched by the FileInstaller, which
does
> > call
> > > a
> > > > > > > refresh on the framework after the install/uninstall of
> bundles.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards, Achim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2015-01-08 18:10 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Gerla <
> > > giuseppe.gerla@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > > > I see a strange behavior about bundles life cycle
management
> i
> > > > Karaf.
> > > > > > > > I have a bundle "Sample Dependent" that depends from
a
> bundles
> > > > > "Sample
> > > > > > > > Dependency". I install both bundle in karaf and they
go in
> > > Started
> > > > > > state.
> > > > > > > > Suppose that "Sample Dependency" has id 87 and "Sample
> > Dependent"
> > > > has
> > > > > > id
> > > > > > > 88.
> > > > > > > > If I digit
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > uninstall 87
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would expect that bundle 88 will go in Installed
(not
> > resolved)
> > > > > > state.
> > > > > > > > Instead the bundle "Sample Dependent" remains in Started.
> > > > > > > > Also if I do refresh or update, the bundle remain
in Started.
> > > > > > > > If I restart karaf I see that the bundle "Sample Dependent"
> is
> > > not
> > > > > > > > resolved.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In the file system folder /data/cache I see that bundle
87
> > > relative
> > > > > > > folder
> > > > > > > > is not deleted until karaf is running. This explain
the
> > behavior.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My question is: is this the desired behavior? Or the
desired
> > > > behavior
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > what I expected?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > N.B. if I use the deploy folder, after removing the
bundle
> > > "Sample
> > > > > > > > Dependency" the bundle "Sample Dependent" goes in
Installed
> > > state.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > Giuseppe
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Apache Member
> > > > > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer
& PMC
> > > > > > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> > > > > Committer
> > > > > > &
> > > > > > > Project Lead
> > > > > > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> > > > > > > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Apache Member
> > > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > > > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> > > Committer
> > > > &
> > > > > Project Lead
> > > > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> > > > > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> > > > >
> > > > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Apache Member
> > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer
> > &
> > > Project Lead
> > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> > > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
> > >
> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Member
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message