karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Any news on the Log4j 2 upgrade?
Date Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:41:08 GMT
Log4j2 has slf4j versions of log4j2 markers, so it would work fine to use
the SLF4J ones. In fact, if it helps, you can use the log4j-slf4j-impl
bundle to bridge log4j-api and log4j-core into slf4j-api.


On 21 July 2014 14:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:

> Hi Gareth,
>
> I refactored the Markers to use slf4j marker in the case of usage of slf4j
> pax-logging-service usage, or natively log4j2 native when using log4j
> pax-logging-service.
> I will add a couple of unit test about that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 07/21/2014 07:36 PM, Gareth wrote:
>
>> Hello Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> I am curious - for the 1.8.0 release are you planning to do anything
>> different with Markers? I understand that Pax Logging currently converts
>> any
>> Markers into an MDC parameter (slf4j.marker) because log4j doesn't support
>> them. However both log4j2 and logback do support Markers natively. Just
>> curious.
>>
>> thanks in advance,
>> Gareth
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.
>> com/Any-news-on-the-Log4j-2-upgrade-tp4034325p4034344.html
>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message