karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: features -> subsystems?
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:00:13 GMT
The scope of karat features is also much much smaller than subsystems since karat features
don't provide isolation.  

david jencks

On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
> 
> the first plan is to coexist.
> 
> It's the same plan for P2 repositories.
> 
> Features is the central and main provisioning for Karaf: we don't plan to move to something
else for now.
> However, provide "bridges" between others systems (like subsystems and P2) is interesting
(both in the runtime and in the karaf-maven-plugin).
> 
> The scope coverage of the Karaf features is "larger" (at least for now) than subsystem.
For instance, the ConfigAdmin/ConfigFile support is very limited in subsystems comparing to
Karaf Features.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 04/12/2013 06:48 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>     Jean-Baptiste
>> 
>>     Can you please clarify what are karaf plans
>>     as it relates to features vs subsystems?
>>     http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html
>>     * will features be replaced by subsystems?
>>     * will features continue as independent?
>>     * will they co-exist
>>     * etc.
>> 
>>     Thank you,
>> 
>>     Andrei
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com


Mime
View raw message