karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
Date Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:59:11 GMT
Hi JB,

I'm fine with a 3.1 specific feature, so if people really want to use
it in the 2.x line they need to make sure they do get the right one.

Besides that I'd prefer that we get 3.0 out asap instead of fumbling
with a 2.4 release

regards, Achim

2012/10/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
> Hi guys,
>
> just an update about this discussion.
>
> I added spring31* features in Karaf 2.3.x.
>
> I don't want to add spring*/3.1.2.RELEASE features, as it will be used by
> default (for instance, if a feature uses a spring version range like [3,4),
> by default, spring 3.1.2.RELEASE would be installed). So, to prevent
> potential side effect, I have clearly identified the features with 31 in the
> name (spring31, spring31-jms, etc).
>
> The issue with this approach is that, if a feature wants to use spring 3.1,
> it should rely on a specific name, which is not perfect.
>
> So I wonder if it doesn't make sense to simply remove spring 3.1.x features
> in Karaf 2.3.0 and wait for Karaf 3.0.0 release (which includes it), or if
> we *really* need Spring 3.1 support quickly prepare Karaf 2.4.0 which can be
> exactly the same as Karaf 2.3.0 but with the upgrades to Spring 3.1 and
> Jetty 8 for instance.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/10/2012 08:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just an summarise and "close" the discussion.
>>
>> Regarding the different message, the final proposal is:
>>
>> - stay with Spring 3.0.x and Jetty 7.6.x in Karaf 2.3.0
>> - depending of the effort, include an optional spring31 feature in Karaf
>> 2.3.0 (I'm working on it and I will give you an update)
>>
>> Regarding Karaf 2.4.x, we can start a discussion thread but I don't
>> think it's a good idea: Karaf 3.0.0 already includes Spring 3.1.x and
>> Jetty 8.x, I think it makes sense to focus on this release more than an
>> intermediate one.
>>
>> Karaf 2.3.0 should be released tonight.
>>
>> Does it work for all ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 10/08/2012 09:38 AM, jb@nanthrax.net wrote:
>>>
>>> Great, thanks a lot !
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
>>>
>>> ----- Reply message -----
>>> From: "Andreas Pieber" <anpieber@gmail.com>
>>> To: <dev@karaf.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
>>> Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 9:17 am
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> @Andreas, could you take a look on KARAF-1878 and KARAF-1752
>>>> (assigned to
>>>> you) ? If you are busy today, I think we can postpone to 2.3.1.
>>>
>>>
>>> I wanted to keep KARAF-1878 opened for review till tonight; I'll apply
>>> afterwards. I'll also apply KARAF-1752 then.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all guys,
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
View raw message