karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
Date Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:23:31 GMT
I think a valid "workaround" would be to offer a spring31 feature, I'm
quite sure
we're able to extract that kind of feature from trunk ;)

regarding the road-map proposal, yes this would be really helpful.
I know we have a Matrix showing which version does contain which
dependencies (@Jamie where is it located?)
but somehow it's again a pain to find it.

I think we need to redo our webpage desperately since not all
information can be found easily and the menu
doesn't necessarily relate to the content (e.g. the manual)

regards, Achim

2012/10/9 Charles Moulliard <ch007m@gmail.com>:
> Even if I understand the karaf position I completely agree about Claus's
> remark to also have Spring 3.1 for Camel and others projects.
>
> What I would like to propose is that we create for Karaf/ServiceMix
> projects a page containing a table of the different software used and have
> a roadmap about them. This question is important not only for Spring
> framework but also Pax, Aries, Felix, ... which are (re)packaged into
> Karaf/ServiceMix
> This will avoid that we discover a few days before the publication of a
> release that we have miss something
>
> Just my 5€ cents.
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Oct 8, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Agree Claus, but Camel is not the only application running on Karaf.
>> >>
>> >> So, we have to think about "others projects" as well.
>> >>
>> >> I have no problem to upgrade to Spring 3.1.x but later (why not imagine
>> a Karaf 2.4.x for that, it could be a good indicator), and propose both
>> Spring 3.0 and 3.1 in Karaf 2.3.0 (depending of the impact, that I gonna
>> test tonight).
>> >
>> > I agree with that.    I know CXF has had very little testing with Spring
>> 3.1.x.    I would definitely prefer keeping on 3.0.7 for Karaf 2.3 and
>> think about that for 2.4.
>> >
>> > I also agree that this is way to close to "release" to flip out a major
>> component like spring.   Maybe a month ago, but not now.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah I can understand the deadline issue as well.
>>
>> But its a shame that the new shiny Karaf 2.3.0 comes out of the box
>> with the old Spring 3.0.7 from Dec 2011. And there has not been any
>> new releases of Spring 3.0.x since.
>>
>> It would be cool if it was possible to provide an easy way for people
>> to switch Karaf to offer Spring 3.1.
>> Maybe that requires to offer a spring31 feature, and an easy way for
>> people to configure Karaf to use that.
>>
>> At Camel we have a CI job that tests Camel with Spring 3.1. The
>> upgrade for Camel has been painless.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> JB
>> >>
>> >> On 10/08/2012 06:48 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Camel 2.10.x uses Spring 3.0.7 for now, for we are "aligned" with
>> Camel
>> >>>> 2.10.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Does it make sense to update to Spring 3.1.x (for future Camel version
>> >>>> maybe) ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Well Camel 2.10 supports both Spring 3.0.x and 3.1.x. And we are
>> >>> frankly only holding back because of Karaf.
>> >>> As when people deploy Camel in Karaf they inherit the spring from
>> Karaf.
>> >>>
>> >>> People in the community would like to use Spring 3.1.x as its been out
>> >>> since December 2011.
>> >>> And its the stable release path where they cut new releases.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regards
>> >>>> JB
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 10/08/2012 05:55 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi Claus,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  From the Karaf 2.3.0 pom file:
>> >>>>>> <spring.osgi.version>1.2.1</spring.osgi.version>
>> >>>>>> <spring2.version>2.5.6.SEC03</spring2.version>
>> >>>>>> <spring.version>3.0.7.RELEASE</spring.version>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Crap I think you guys shoulder consider switching to the 3.1.2
>> release
>> >>>>> of Spring.
>> >>>>> As well Jetty 7.6.7, so people have the latest stable release
of
>> these
>> >>>>> 2 important pieces.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>> Jamie
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What Spring version does Karaf 2.3.0 come with out of
the box?
>> 3.0.x
>> >>>>>>> or the newer 3.1.x ?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jamie G. <
>> jamie.goodyear@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I'm always ready!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>>>> Jamie
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, jb@nanthrax.net
<jb@nanthrax.net>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks a lot !
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>>>>>>>> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ----- Reply message -----
>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Andreas Pieber" <anpieber@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>> To: <dev@karaf.apache.org>
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 9:17 am
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Hey,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste
Onofré <
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> @Andreas, could you take a look on KARAF-1878
and KARAF-1752
>> >>>>>>>>>> (assigned to
>> >>>>>>>>>> you) ? If you are busy today, I think we
can postpone to 2.3.1.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to keep KARAF-1878 opened for review
till tonight; I'll
>> apply
>> >>>>>>>>> afterwards. I'll also apply KARAF-1752 then.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>> >>>>>>>>> Andreas
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks all guys,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>>>>> JB
>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Claus Ibsen
>> >>>>>>> -----------------
>> >>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >>>>>>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>> >>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> >>>>>>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> >>>>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> >>>>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >> jbonofre@apache.org
>> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Moulliard
> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
View raw message