karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott England-Sullivan <sully6...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] OSGi core version in Karaf version
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:55:09 GMT
Thanks JB.

Updated patches have been added to KARAF-1753.

Best Regards,
Scott ES

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>wrote:

> Thanks Scott,
>
> I will review and apply the patch.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 09/12/2012 03:30 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me.  They still have a number of issues that they are
>> working to include in 1.8.x.  I will add a note in the Javadoc stating
>> what
>> version is currently supported.
>>
>> I am uploading a new patch to KARAF-1753 today.  It will take the place of
>> the one currently attached to the ticket.  It catches up on some conflicts
>> to the original patch.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Scott ES
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Oh, got it Scott.
>>>
>>> IMHO, I would prefer to stay with Felix DS 1.6.0. As we are going to
>>> release 2.3.0 very soon, we can ship SNAPSHOT.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 09/12/2012 03:22 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>>  Thanks for the response.  Bad question on my part.
>>>>
>>>> Better question is are we going to wait until all the functionality that
>>>> is
>>>> to be included in Karaf 2.3 that is dependent on the corresponding Felix
>>>> projects to get updated?  Felix DS (SCR) with support for OSGi 4.3/DS
>>>> Spec
>>>> 1.2 (Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT) is still under development.
>>>>
>>>> Should I migrate the SCR bundles to the Felix DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT for
>>>> Karaf
>>>> 2.3?
>>>>
>>>> Or do I wait, leave it at OSGi 4.2/DS Spec 1.1 (Felix DS 1.6.0) and then
>>>> update them in a later release of Karaf 2.3.x?
>>>>
>>>> I am OK with either.  Just need your input.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   Hi Scott,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Karaf 2.3 already uses OSGi r4.3 (and corresponding framework).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/12/2012 02:41 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What was the final outcome on this?  Is Karaf-2.3.x going to be based
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> OSGi 4.3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Needing to know if I should update the Karaf 2.3.x SCR bundles to
the
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>> DS 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT which has the 4.3 support in it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Scott ES
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Freeman Fang <freeman.fang@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>    +1 for Andreas's first plan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Freeman
>>>>>>> -------------
>>>>>>> Freeman Fang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>>>> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
>>>>>>> Web: fusesource.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.******com<http://freemanfang.**
>>>>>>> blogspot.com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com<http://freemanfang.blogspot.com>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/******1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/****1473905042>
>>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/**1473905042>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/**1473905042<http://com.cn/u/1473905042>
>>>>>>> <http://blog.sina.**com.cn/u/1473905042<http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2012-8-18, at 下午1:19, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    TBH I personally would rather prefer:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know that both options are not really optimal, but I don't
think
>>>>>>>> that we really want to upgrade the inner core of the entire
thing to
>>>>>>>> the next major version in a minor of Karaf. There where some
API
>>>>>>>> changes from a user lvl of view which disallow to drop the
same
>>>>>>>> bundle
>>>>>>>> into a 4.2/4.3 environment and a 5.0. I do not really fancy
the idea
>>>>>>>> of breaking compatibility between minor releases. If ppls
setup
>>>>>>>> break
>>>>>>>> from one minor to the next they lost trust and upgrade ways
too late
>>>>>>>> although there should be no reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>> jb@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Hi team,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As you know, OSGi core 5.0.0 has been released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to discuss about which version of Karaf
should support
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   which
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   version of the OSGi core (and so the corresponding OSGi
>>>>>>> frameworks).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have the following proposal:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
>>>>>>>>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
>>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.0.x => OSGi core 4.3.0
>>>>>>>>> - Karaf 3.1.x => OSGi core 5.0.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would wait Karaf 3.1.x to update to OSGi core 5.0.0
as the OSGi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   frameworks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   are not yet fully ready on this specification.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



-- 
-- 
Scott England-Sullivan
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web:     http://www.fusesource.com
Blog:     http://sully6768.blogspot.com
Twitter: sully6768

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message