Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of anpieber@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADHGh9W-wwUBoenwRHnQ-T2y8W6d-sZ9yWd_yNz_35ZwHevmmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <502ECA18.5070307@nanthrax.net>
	<CAK--DP-Pd3+m4P4Vr6ysDBW4ctZ0M1JGCgf7oR9amG=dR86VdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADHGh9W-wwUBoenwRHnQ-T2y8W6d-sZ9yWd_yNz_35ZwHevmmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:59:26 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAK--DP9-XE0d-oMU6uJz62F0qJ1OYUJ_6F0tLVS3Y=z4mYq7=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OSGi core version in Karaf version
From: Andreas Pieber <anpieber@gmail.com>
To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've no problem with either of those since the 4.3 release of the core
does not break backward compatibility (compared to 5.0) --> also fine
with that approach (BUT, AFAIK 2.3.x had been ported to 4.3 already)

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like Andreas first proposal but with a minor change:
>
> - Karaf 2.2.x => OSGi core 4.2.0
>> - Karaf 2.3.x => OSGi core 4.2.0 (at some point we need to deliver new
>> features, without changing the world. For 4.3.0 in the 2.x branches maybe
>> we could have a 2.4.x, 2.5.x version of Karaf)
>>
>  - Karaf 3.x.y => OSGi core 4.3.0
>> - Karaf 4.x.y => OSGi core 5.0.0
>>
>
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *