karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Do not depend to OSGi Compendium
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:23:58 GMT
Hi Andreas,

yes to my understanding this was only for versions where we need
ranges, not all :)

regards, Achim

2012/6/4 Andreas Pieber <anpieber@gmail.com>:
> From my side too + 1 to both proposals.
>
> I don't think that the additional version ranges will produce too much work
> IIF we're able to keep those versions together in the form of properties.
>
> E. G.
>
> Pax. Web. Version...
> Pax. Web. Range...
>
> That way we'll always be reminded if we update one. In addition I think we
> can introduce them on demand and don't have to do it all at once.
>
> Kind regards, Andreas
> On Jun 4, 2012 11:47 AM, "Ioannis Canellos" <iocanel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that it does make sense without add too much effort.
>>
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> *
>> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>>
>> **
>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> **
>> Twitter: iocanel
>> *
>>



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
View raw message