karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Karaf 2.3.x branch guideline
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:59:22 GMT
For the "Web"-Part I think we can go for the following versions:

Karaf 2.2.x
- Jetty 7.x + Pax Web 1.0.x

Karaf 2.3.x
- Jetty 7.x + Pax Web 1.1.x (already available)

Karaf 3.x
- Jetty 8.x + Pax Web 2.0 (working on it, but close to release ;) )


Regards, Achim

2012/4/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
> About the versions, I propose:
>
> JDK
> - karaf-2.2.x: build and compliant with JDK 1.5/1.6
> - karaf-2.3.x: build and compliant with JDK 1.6/1.7
> - trunk: build and compliant with JDK 1.6/1.7
>
> OSGi
> - karaf-2.2.x: OSGi r4.2 (Felix 3.x, Equinox 3.6.x)
> - karaf 2.3.x/trunk: OSGi r4.3 (Felix 4.x, Equinox 3.7.x)
>
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/10/2012 10:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as you probably saw, Guillaume created the karaf-2.3.x branch.
>> We started to move Jira issues on the "correct" branches.
>>
>> I propose the following guidelines for the different branches:
>> - karaf-2.2.x is only for bug fixes: no refactoring, no new features, no
>> enhancements, only bug fixes
>> - karaf-2.3.x is for bug fixes and new features. It's a kind of mix
>> between 3.0.0 and 2.2.x. Most of the 3.0.0 features will be there (OSGi
>> r4.3), but not sub-shell, and pax-url-mvn (not aether).
>> - trunk (3.0.0) includes OSGi r4.3 (and related OSGi frameworks),
>> sub-shell, pax-url-aether, etc.
>>
>> Does it sound good for you ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
View raw message