Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0E0798FE for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 04:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68444 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2011 04:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 68330 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2011 04:48:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 68299 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2011 04:48:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:48:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anpieber@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:48:08 +0000 Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so2667306vws.21 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:47:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/JdJAZ3Fsoqkvrg0mC6XHfQur1Hb+/4XPChnWlknXuY=; b=EslND3JD6APL/yv+tGL5SNrAkDog5+olQg56bKVtE5rUwQTO5va/RsXlhRY9uMplHK J7Ks/PFUVevZTGgYLj7JCQTMLbAUsmISlPNSGKWDGXTD5sw+RpBOnNgZKAMXVy+7G6ra RWb6qD5/TMXkSQy88P9zbPMDpvu71LNhISsCQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.83 with SMTP id l19mr12858319vdt.196.1317444467752; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.133 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:47:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28C9C925-3EFE-4539-8F08-48AC5478930C@codehaus.org> References: <76F3294E-66FD-4854-AFBE-5E5CF8856A5F@yahoo.com> <28C9C925-3EFE-4539-8F08-48AC5478930C@codehaus.org> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 06:47:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is the mvn url handler really usable? From: Andreas Pieber To: dev@karaf.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d002c82fd0304ae3571f3 --20cf307d002c82fd0304ae3571f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there a description we can reproduce this problem every time. TBH I've not encountered any of such problems by now. If you've something reproducible please report an issue at team.ops4j.org. The problem will be located in the pax-url modules (maybe an aether update is required). Kind regards, Andreas On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 04:30, Brian Topping wrote: > I've seen the same thing, and have a recollection of this happening on > 2.2.2 as well. > > On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > On trunk, I've been having severe problems lately with the mvn url > handler downloading ancient snapshots and overwriting my just-built > snapshots. > > > > Is this a configuration problem or something dreadfully wrong with the > url handler design (or just a bug)? > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > --20cf307d002c82fd0304ae3571f3--