Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2B67B5A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86075 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2011 10:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 86052 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2011 10:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 86044 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2011 10:27:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:27:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bcanhome@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:27:49 +0000 Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so745120iak.21 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=e1cpJl6CxtGu8UA3UpEEE2PL727SBKpM+nhggA81MNw=; b=jestKrZkYjr6c65nBI+yDaFvLCzSp6NPJMKh0p3Zbfs3MoRzAC8vOtpj8gMk6KL2Sg F+f4zp9p8SAVTl7cZTny/C248sfEVbOLuYiNTfykxgHaApd6OKA2MWDAHWqxN7tS9e2z L4fmMRIJB6G0drao3dOiXWaB6e17BNI+bc+Eo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.11 with SMTP id z11mr784425ibk.77.1318933648683; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.19.205 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:27:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E9D517F.9070805@nanthrax.net> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:27:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] New Karaf commands norm From: Achim Nierbeck To: dev@karaf.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6b3269cb3a104af902b0c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd6b3269cb3a104af902b0c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on those commands regards, Achim 2011/10/18 Andreas Pieber > My comment on the rename of the admin service could be applied here too; = I > think it makes sense to be consistent here and if we don't risk to setup > some existing users we could never evolve and will stuck forever with old > stuff :-( > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9 > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > in order to be consistent, I would like to apply the same "norm" for al= l > > Karaf commands. > > > > I propose the following: > > > > 1/ all command scope should be singular (features:* become feature:*, > > bundles:* become bundle:*) > > 2/ command name separator is -. For instance, config:propdel become > > config:prop-del > > 3/ "fine grained commands" should be respect the command-action format. > For > > instance, features:addUrl become feature:url-add, feature:url-list > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofr=E9 > > jbonofre@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > --=20 -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web Committer & Project Lead blog --000e0cd6b3269cb3a104af902b0c--