Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 927119E42 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 02:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29064 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2011 02:31:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-dev-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 29035 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2011 02:31:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 29027 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2011 02:31:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [204.152.97.1] (HELO mail.orb.org) (204.152.97.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.5.206] (ip-64-134-64-15.public.wayport.net [64.134.64.15]) by mail.orb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73F5246BC for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251) Subject: Re: Is the mvn url handler really usable? From: Brian Topping In-Reply-To: <76F3294E-66FD-4854-AFBE-5E5CF8856A5F@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:30:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <28C9C925-3EFE-4539-8F08-48AC5478930C@codehaus.org> References: <76F3294E-66FD-4854-AFBE-5E5CF8856A5F@yahoo.com> To: dev@karaf.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've seen the same thing, and have a recollection of this happening on = 2.2.2 as well.=20 On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: > On trunk, I've been having severe problems lately with the mvn url = handler downloading ancient snapshots and overwriting my just-built = snapshots. >=20 > Is this a configuration problem or something dreadfully wrong with the = url handler design (or just a bug)? >=20 > thanks > david jencks >=20 >=20