karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: feature names are potentially ambiguous?
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:52:53 GMT
+1/-1 from my side; I've no problem with the new feature names, but it's
also OK for me to use the old structure.

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 14:07, Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>wrote:

> +1 for reverting to a more user-friendly naming, I kinda like the "project
> shortname"-"feature" syntax like karaf-obr or the like
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2011/10/13 Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com>
>
> > >
> > > I think we should revert the name (I will do it if all are agree). If,
> as
> > > David said, some feature name are ambiguous (for instance jndi), I have
> > no
> > > problem to change to more descriptive name (for instance,
> > aries-jndi-service
> > > or whatever).
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I agree on that and I think that Daniel mentioned that as a naming
> > convention.
> > --
> > *Ioannis Canellos*
> > *
> > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
> >
> > **
> > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> > **
> > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>  Committer
> > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> > *
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>  Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message