karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: feature names are potentially ambiguous?
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:07:11 GMT
+1 for reverting to a more user-friendly naming, I kinda like the "project
shortname"-"feature" syntax like karaf-obr or the like

regards, Achim

2011/10/13 Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com>

> >
> > I think we should revert the name (I will do it if all are agree). If, as
> > David said, some feature name are ambiguous (for instance jndi), I have
> no
> > problem to change to more descriptive name (for instance,
> aries-jndi-service
> > or whatever).
> >
>
> Yes, I agree on that and I think that Daniel mentioned that as a naming
> convention.
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> *
> FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
>
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>  Committer
> Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer
> *
>



-- 
--
*Achim Nierbeck*


Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>  Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message