karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Moulliard <cmoulli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename admin service to instance service
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:55:36 GMT
+1 for renaming, to be consistent in the name (features --> feature,
....) and adding in shell.init.script aliases for backward
compatibility

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Achim Nierbeck
<bcanhome@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1 on renaming, if we can't get it done with a 3.0 when else should we be
> able to.
> I'm a big fan of "clean cut" every now and then :)
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2011/10/18 Andreas Pieber <anpieber@gmail.com>
>
>> On one hand I'm with Charles; but on the other hand I think we should not
>> be
>> caught up by backward compatibility. That's what major releases are for and
>> we should increase karaf's usability if we have a chance to do so, even if
>> it means to set up some already existing users... --> +1 to the rename; tbh
>> I was always curious about the name :-)
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:09, Charles Moulliard <cmoulliard@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi JB,
>> >
>> > This is an interesting suggestion but we should be backward compatible
>> > with what we have done before. That means that if we modify admin:*
>> > command name then we have also to modify the script in the bin
>> > directory from admin into instance. BTW, that could be a bit annoying
>> > for operations guys having create scripts to start/stop instances or
>> > create new instances as they will have to change admin into instance
>> > into their scripts (sh, perl, ...) ! Be careful.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Charles
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > In our current work to clean and more user-friendly Karaf 3.0, I would
>> > like
>> > > to propose to rename the admin service to instance service.
>> > >
>> > > Especially the admin:* commands and AdminMBean are not very clear for
>> the
>> > > users (admin can mean a lot of things).
>> > >
>> > > I propose to rename this to instance:
>> > >
>> > > admin:list will become instance:list
>> > > admin:create will become instance:create
>> > > etc
>> > >
>> > > WDYT ?
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > JB
>> > > --
>> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > > jbonofre@apache.org
>> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>  Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>

Mime
View raw message