karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: feature names are potentially ambiguous?
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:14:02 GMT
Hi David,

just to understand, is it not a Geronimo usage (I didn't take a look of 
that in Geronimo) ?

I'm not sure that sub-systems will help.

On 10/13/2011 06:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> The fact that the features you mentioned are provided by the Karaf doesn't
>> mean that we need to prefix them with karaf.
>> For example we can only use the project that implements those features and
>> end up with something like this:
>>
>> aries-jndi
>> aries-tx
>> spring-tx
>> camel-jpa
>> karaf-webconsole
>>
>> wdyt?
>
> Absolutely not.  If geronimo wants to use a different selection of bundles for an aries-jndi
feature it should be able to without any difference in naming convention.
>
> I'd check the subsystem spec to see what they plan to use.  The sample subsystems I've
seen all use a bsn-like name.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> *
>> FuseSource<http://fusesource.com>
>>
>> **
>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> **
>> Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/>  Committer&  PMC
>> Apache ServiceMix<http://servicemix.apache.org/>   Committer
>> Apache Gora<http://incubator.apache.org/gora/>  Committer
>> *
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message