Mailing-List: contact users-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@kafka.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of junrao@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANNBgPKJfWfxGTLP6cFD==3ZxyasUQi_EdJhsw=xh0jiwWrAnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANNBgPKJfWfxGTLP6cFD==3ZxyasUQi_EdJhsw=xh0jiwWrAnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:20:23 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAFbh0Q2P8TCNQMLu8JCQbhAj-gjA13uGeAj1dnzqgndRnuY+TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
From: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
To: "users@kafka.apache.org" <users@kafka.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c0240224e104dc36791d

--e89a8ff1c0240224e104dc36791d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through
metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring.

Thanks,

Jun


On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see
> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ).  We use Kafka ourselves and
> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase,
> Solr, and other metrics we monitor.
>
> My questions:
> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka?
> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM?
> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8?  Is
> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7?
>
> Thanks,
> Otis
> --
> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
>

--e89a8ff1c0240224e104dc36791d--