Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A140F600 for ; Thu, 9 May 2013 04:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95532 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2013 04:32:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 95509 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2013 04:32:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@kafka.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 95492 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2013 04:32:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 May 2013 04:32:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of junrao@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 May 2013 04:32:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v19so2511049obq.2 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 21:31:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HHSU0GsRd9eP99dMf3ji35d09/w/RlprCjkLzNMDDkY=; b=jLdZOUGKZCrCyPRCytcObOfVLjS5WMDGuV7MdzQ/ngo/HcspXk3Gw4BwL7weAjClGz /uPUEVwdTDNoP5eyR1DAXpduvzkAON4TDAdszHwYjtBnOykoqefVjtI/X1I8teoriF8W ZirppYHS7DMcpVVkRlbXdzbu6aTrtTKrIUnaOnk10OiUpw7nlayV8rLiiZSHfasHz2R7 cEkl/5dG9dBaMOKtPlhx639ShL90oDsG1zAZzVreoiBrkOnWDmlmxJBoIuK/yRhc7GRv m3ZorqTpMzkeLsC/QnaQXhdi2sdelgsAOrK6IZBv/Ob01FSMzk8TDxXERILwMX17c42O 7bRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.137.196 with SMTP id qk4mr3358727obb.53.1368073911889; Wed, 08 May 2013 21:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.1.137 with HTTP; Wed, 8 May 2013 21:31:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1368047458.29972.YahooMailNeo@web126001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1368047458.29972.YahooMailNeo@web126001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 21:31:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX From: Jun Rao To: "users@kafka.apache.org" , Otis Gospodnetic Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c340528b79a404dc4187a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c340528b79a404dc4187a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is also a Ganglia reporter for metrics. Don't know how much overhead it adds though. Thanks, Jun On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi Jun, > > Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX > in 0.7? > Or have names or types of beans changed? > > Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP? > > Thanks, > Otis > ---- > Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop - > http://sematext.com/spm > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Jun Rao > >To: "users@kafka.apache.org" > >Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM > >Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX > > > > > >0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through > >metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Jun > > > > > >On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < > otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see > >> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ). We use Kafka ourselves and > >> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase, > >> Solr, and other metrics we monitor. > >> > >> My questions: > >> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka? > >> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM? > >> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8? Is > >> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Otis > >> -- > >> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html > >> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > >> > > > > > > > --001a11c340528b79a404dc4187a2--