kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
Date Wed, 08 May 2013 16:11:22 GMT
See http://metrics.codahale.com/getting-started/#reporting-via-http

Thanks,

Jun


On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Dennis Haller <dhaller@talenttech.com>wrote:

> What exactly is a metric reporter - something in log4j?
>
> Thanks
> Dennis
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through
> > metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> > otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see
> > > http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ).  We use Kafka ourselves and
> > > would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase,
> > > Solr, and other metrics we monitor.
> > >
> > > My questions:
> > > * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka?
> > > * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM?
> > > * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8?  Is
> > > 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Otis
> > > --
> > > Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
> > > Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message