kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
Date Wed, 08 May 2013 21:10:58 GMT
Hi Jun,

Does that imply that what 0.8 puts in JMX is a superset of what's in JMX in 0.7?
Or have names or types of beans changed?

Also, do you recommend getting metrics via JMX or via HTTP?

Thanks,
Otis 
----
Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase / Hadoop - http://sematext.com/spm 




>________________________________
> From: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
>To: "users@kafka.apache.org" <users@kafka.apache.org> 
>Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 11:20 AM
>Subject: Re: Kafka Monitoring, 0.7 vs. 0.8 JMX
> 
>
>0.8 JMX is different from 0.7. In 0.8, all jmx beans are exposed through
>metrics. One can attach a metric reporter for monitoring.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jun
>
>
>On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're considering adding Kafka monitoring to SPM (see
>> http://sematext.com/spm/index.html ).  We use Kafka ourselves and
>> would like to see our Kafka metrics in SPM along with Hadoop, HBase,
>> Solr, and other metrics we monitor.
>>
>> My questions:
>> * What do people currently use for monitoring Kafka?
>> * Is there apetite for adding Kafka support to SPM?
>> * How different is the structure/content of JMX for 0.7 vs. 0.8?  Is
>> 0.8 a backwards-compatible superset of 0.7?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Otis
>> --
>> Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
>> Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
>>
>
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message