Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65837200CF0 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:35:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 64F6416105A; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB0F0160D30 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:35:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 36155 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2017 14:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jira-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@kafka.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jira@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 36144 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2017 14:35:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:35:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 32505C4C72 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9eaU1x12R1b for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 60AF25FCE2 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20574E0ED8 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 61C202415B for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Paolo Patierno (JIRA)" To: jira@kafka.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (KAFKA-5723) Refactor BrokerApiVersionsCommand to use AdminClient MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:35:15 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16157009#comment-16157009 ] Paolo Patierno edited comment on KAFKA-5723 at 9/7/17 2:34 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- [~adyachkov] [~viktorsomogyi] the discussion on how to handle this is going on the mailing list. What [~ijuma] is proposing is to have small PRs against the trunk so that the committers can check and merge them easily. My idea is the following : * Then [KAFKA-3268|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3268] can be used as umbrella for our works on different components * For sure we have some common components (i.e. CommandOptions). My idea is to get my CommandOptions class and the suggestion from [~adyachkov] (from his PR) and then making a PR with just it and some other changes. This should be done adding a subtask to main KAFKA-3268 JIRA. * Then you and committers can review the PR * When the PR will be merged we can continue on our different works refactoring the different tools Does it make sense to you ? was (Author: ppatierno): [~adyachkov] [~viktorsomogyi] the discussion on how to handle this is going on the mailing list. What [~ijuma] is proposing is to have small PRs against the trunk so that the committers can check and merge them easily. My idea is the following : * Then [KAFKA-3268|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3268] can be used as umbrella for our works on different components * For sure we have some common components (i.e. CommandOptions). My idea is to get my CommandOptions class and the suggestion from [~adyachkov] (from his PR) and then making a PR with just it and some other changes. This should be don adding a subtask to main KAFKA-3268 JIRA. * Then you and committers can review the PR * When the PR will be merged we can continue on our different works refactoring the different tools Does it make sense to you ? > Refactor BrokerApiVersionsCommand to use AdminClient > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-5723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5723 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Viktor Somogyi > Assignee: Viktor Somogyi > > Currently it uses the deprecated AdminClient and in order to remove usages of that client, this class needs to be refactored. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)