kafka-jira mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Raoufeh Hashemian (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (KAFKA-5857) Excessive heap usage on controller node during reassignment
Date Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:42:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16161757#comment-16161757
] 

Raoufeh Hashemian edited comment on KAFKA-5857 at 9/11/17 6:41 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

We have 960 partition for this topic. I wonder what is the relationship between memory usage
of controller and number of partitions? linear ?! is 960 partitions too much for a single
topic? 


was (Author: rsh2000):
We have 960 partition for this topic, I wonder what is the relationship between memory usage
of controller and number of partitions? linear ?! is 960 partitions too much for a single
topic? 

> Excessive heap usage on controller node during reassignment
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-5857
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5857
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: controller
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.0.0
>         Environment: CentOs 7, Java 1.8
>            Reporter: Raoufeh Hashemian
>              Labels: reliability
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: CPU.png, disk_write_x.png, memory.png, reassignment_plan.txt
>
>
> I was trying to expand our kafka cluster of 6 broker nodes to 12 broker nodes. 
> Before expansion, we had a single topic with 960 partitions and a replication factor
of 3. So each node had 480 partitions. The size of data in each node was 3TB . 
> To do the expansion, I submitted a partition reassignment plan (see attached file for
the current/new assignments). The plan was optimized to minimize data movement and be rack
aware. 
> When I submitted the plan, it took approximately 3 hours for moving data from old to
new nodes to complete. After that, it started deleting source partitions (I say this based
on the number of file descriptors) and rebalancing leaders which has not been successful.
Meanwhile, the heap usage in the controller node started to go up with a large slope (along
with long GC times) and it took 5 hours for the controller to go out of memory and another
controller started to have the same behaviour for another 4 hours. At this time the zookeeper
ran out of disk and the service stopped.
> To recover from this condition:
> 1) Removed zk logs to free up disk and restarted all 3 zk nodes
> 2) Deleted /kafka/admin/reassign_partitions node from zk
> 3) Had to do unclean restarts of kafka service on oom controller nodes which took 3 hours
to complete  . After this stage there was still 676 under replicated partitions.
> 4) Do a clean restart on all 12 broker nodes.
> After step 4 , number of under replicated nodes went to 0.
> So I was wondering if this memory footprint from controller is expected for 1k partitions
? Did we do sth wrong or it is a bug?
> Attached are some resource usage graph during this 30 hours event and the reassignment
plan. I'll try to add log files as well



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message