kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] KIP-559: Make the Kafka Protocol Friendlier with L7 Proxies
Date Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:35:27 GMT
David, thanks for the KIP. This looks like a nice improvement. Explicit
over implicit :)

+1, binding

-David

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:17 PM Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io> wrote:

> Thanks, +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:06 PM David Jacot <djacot@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. You have brought a good point. I did not
> consider
> > this but your are right. It makes sense to add it as well in order to
> able
> > to fully
> > parse the SyncGroup request/response. Let me update the KIP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:52 PM Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > Just one question. In addition to including the protocol type, I'm
> > > wondering if there is value in adding the protocol name to SyncGroup?
> > This
> > > would potentially give you the ability to parse the "user data" field
> in
> > > the consumer group schema.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:35 AM David Jacot <djacot@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-559: Make the Kafka Protocol
> > > Friendlier
> > > > with L7 Proxies.
> > > >
> > > > The KIP is here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-559%3A+Make+the+Kafka+Protocol+Friendlier+with+L7+Proxies
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > David
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
David Arthur

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message