kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-467: Augment ProduceResponse error messaging
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:24:33 GMT
Hi Jun,

Thanks for your comments.

1. Yeah I think APIException would not make a distinct call here anymore,
and what really matters is the RetriableException. Updated the wiki.

2. Makes sense. Updated the wiki.

3. My current thoughts is to return the first ever hit error for that
partition, and also the encoded error_records would only includes the
relative offsets of records that hitting that exact error as well.


Guozhang

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:38 PM Jun Rao <jun@confluent.io> wrote:

> Hi, Guozhang,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. A few comments below.
>
> 1. "If the error_records is not empty and the error code is not API
> exception and is not retriable, still retry by creating a new batch ".
> InvalidTimestampException
> is an ApiException. It seems we should still retry the non-error records in
> the batch.
>
> 2. error_records => [INT64] : Since we don't have more than 2 billion
> messages per batch, we can just use INT32. It would also be useful to
> describe what those numbers are. I guess they are the relative offset in
> the batch?
>
> 3. It's possible that a batch of records hit more than one type of error
> for different records, which error code and error message should the server
> return to the client?
>
> Jun
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:44 PM Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion thread on this newly created KIP to
> improve
> > error communication and handling for producer response:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-467%3A+Augment+ProduceResponse+error+messaging+for+specific+culprit+records
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message