kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:52:23 GMT
+1. Thanks Ismael!


Guozhang

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Stevo Slavić <sslavic@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 4/24/18 4:21 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > > +1 Thanks Ismael.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:01 AM, Thomas Crayford <
> > tcrayford@salesforce.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding). Whilst 1.0 -> 2.0 seems like visibly a "big" jump
in
> > >> version numbers to have so soon after 1.0, it makes sense with semver
> > >> requirements and the deprecations contained.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Tom Crayford
> > >> Heroku Kafka
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 AM, zhenya Sun <token01@126.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> no-binding。 +1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> from my iphone!
> > >>> On 04/24/2018 18:19, Sandor Murakozi wrote:
> > >>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>> Thx Ismael
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Matt Farmer <matt@frmr.me>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 (non-binding). TY!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, tao xiao <xiaotao183@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 non-binding. thx Ismael
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 at 23:14 Vahid S Hashemian <
> > >>>> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks Ismael.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --Vahid
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From:   Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <quilcate.jorge@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> To:     dev@kafka.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Date:   04/19/2018 07:32 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject:        Re: [VOTE] Kafka 2.0.0 in June 2018
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non binding), thanks Ismael!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> El jue., 19 abr. 2018 a las 13:01, Manikumar (<
> > >>>> manikumar.reddy@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> )
> > >>>>>> escribió:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek <
> > >>>>>>> stephane@simplemachines.com.au> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <
> > >> gwen@confluent.io>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma
<
> > >>> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I started a discussion last year about
bumping the version
> > >> of
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> June
> > >>>>>>>>> 2018
> > >>>>>>>>>> release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons
in the
> > >> original
> > >>>>>> post:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java
7), which requires
> > >> a
> > >>>>> major
> > >>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>>>>>>> bump due to semantic versioning.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated
code that was
> > >>>> deprecated
> > >>>>>>> prior
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old
Scala clients) so
> > >>>> that
> > >>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>> move faster.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> One concern that was raised is that we
still do not have a
> > >>>>> rolling
> > >>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > >>>>>>>>>> path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since
the Scala
> > >> clients
> > >>>>>> haven't
> > >>>>>>>> been
> > >>>>>>>>>> updated in a long time (they don't support
security or the
> > >>>> latest
> > >>>>>>>> message
> > >>>>>>>>>> format), users who need them can continue
to use 1.1.0 with
> > >>> no
> > >>>>>> loss
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> functionality.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Since it's already mid-April and people
seemed receptive
> > >>> during
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> discussion last year, I'm going straight
to a vote, but we
> > >>> can
> > >>>>>>> discuss
> > >>>>>>>>> more
> > >>>>>>>>>> if needed (of course).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ismael
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> > >>>>> apache.org_thread.html_dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93
> > >>>>> &d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-
> > >>>>> kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=
> > >>>> lBt342M2PM_
> > >>>>> 4czzbFWtAc63571qsZGc9sfB7A5DlZPo&e=
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> *Gwen Shapira*
> > >>>>>>>>> Product Manager | Confluent
> > >>>>>>>>> 650.450.2760 <(650)%20450-2760> | @gwenshap
> > >>>>>>>>> Follow us: Twitter <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> > >>>>> twitter.com_ConfluentInc&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> > >>>> siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > >>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=KcgJLWP_UEkzMrujjrbJA4QfHPDrJjcaWS95p2LGewU&e=
> > >>>>>>> | blog
> > >>>>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> > >>>>> confluent.io_blog&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
> > >>>>> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=dA4UE_6i8-
> > >> ltuLeZapDpOBc_8-
> > >>>>> XI9HTNmZdteu6wfk8&s=XaV8g8yeT1koLf1dbc30NTzBdXB6GAj7FwD8J2VP7iY&e=
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message