kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Roesler <j...@confluent.io>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-288: Consumer poll timeout change and new waitForAssignment method
Date Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:08:42 GMT
Hi all,

I'm closing this discussion and marking KIP-288 as discarded. Please pick
up the discussion on the KIP-266 thread.

Thanks,
-John

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:07 PM, John Roesler <john@confluent.io> wrote:

> Ah, I see that this KIP is a sub-kip of KIP-266. Sorry about that; I've
> sent a message to the discussion thread of KIP-266 to work this out.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:29 PM, John Roesler <john@confluent.io> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Richard, I'll check it out.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Richard Yu <yohan.richard.yu@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> bq. #1 (wait for metadata) is infinite.
>>>
>>> Some of what you stated in this KIP has already been previously discussed
>>> in a older KIP. (KIP-266)
>>> Just for your reference.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Richard
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:08 AM, John Roesler <john@confluent.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello all,
>>> >
>>> > I am proposing KIP-288 to improve the semantics of Consumer.poll()
>>> w.r.t.
>>> > the timeout parameter and to add a new method for blocking for
>>> assignment
>>> > only.
>>> >
>>> > Please find the details here:
>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>> > 288%3A+Consumer.poll%28%29+timeout+semantic+change+and+
>>> > new+waitForAssignment+method
>>> >
>>> > Please let me know what you think!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > -John
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message