kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:16:41 GMT
Note that the code freeze date is Oct.3, so people will have about two
weeks for that.


Guozhang

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Yes, although it would have to be reviewed and merged by next Wednesday.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM, James Cheng <wushujames@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ismael. Yes, you're right, PR 3799 is purely a refactoring.
> >
> > There are new subtasks of https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480> that I haven't yet
> > filed, that I want to work on. They will add auto generation of metrics
> > documentation for more areas of the codebase. So I was trying to figure
> out
> > what were my chances of getting them into 1.0.0, to help me prioritize
> when
> > I should work on them.
> >
> > But to your general point, it sounds like if I make my case and the
> > community agrees that its worth the cost/benefit, that it might be
> eligible
> > to get into 1.0.0. Sounds perfect. Thanks!
> >
> > -James
> >
> > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > Isn't PR 3799 purely a code refactoring (i.e. no change in behaviour)?
> If
> > > so, it would probably land in trunk only after today. If it's new
> > > functionality, then it depends on size, risk and importance. If you
> think
> > > it's important and should target 1.0.0, feel free to make your case in
> > the
> > > JIRA or PR.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:59 PM, James Cheng <wushujames@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi. I'm a little unclear on what types of things are subject to the
> > >> "Feature Freeze" today (Sept 20th).
> > >>
> > >> For changes such as https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799 <
> > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799> and
> > https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/KAFKA-3480>
> > >> that don't require KIPs, is today the freeze date? If I have PR
> created
> > but
> > >> not yet reviewed, does that mean it is eligible to get into 1.0.0?
> > >>
> > >> And if I have a PR that comes AFTER today, does that mean it is NOT
> > >> eligible for 1.0.0?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> -James
> > >>
> > >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Sure! Please feel free to update the wiki.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Guozhang
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > rajinisivaram@gmail.com
> > >>>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Guozhang,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and
PR
> > >> should
> > >>>> be ready soon.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Rajini
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked
> > people
> > >> to
> > >>>>> recast a vote on a small change.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Tom,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and
voting has
> > not
> > >>>>> been
> > >>>>>> started?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Guozhang
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Tom Bentley <
> t.j.bentley@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too,
please?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Tom
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 6 September 2017 at 22:04, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi Vahid,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Yes I have just added it while sending this email
:)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Guozhang
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian
<
> > >>>>>>>> vahidhashemian@us.ibm.com
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Guozhang,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Can KIP-163 be added to the list?
> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and
the PR is ready for
> > >>>>> review.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>> --Vahid
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> From:   Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> To:     "dev@kafka.apache.org" <dev@kafka.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>> Date:   09/06/2017 01:45 PM
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject:        1.0.0 KIPs Update
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hello folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.a
> > >>>>>>>>> pache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D717649
> > >>>>>>>>> 13&d=DwIBaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_itwloTQj3_
> > >>>>>>>>> xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=bLvgeykOujjty9joOuWXD4wZab
> > >>>>>>>>> o1CV0pULY4eqBxqzk&s=90UN7ejzCQmdPOyRR_
> > >>>> 2z304xLUSBCtOYi0KqhAo4EyU&e=
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We have one week left towards the KIP deadline,
which is Sept.
> > >>>> 13th.
> > >>>>>>>> There
> > >>>>>>>>> are still a lot of KIPs that under discussion
/ voting process.
> > >>>> For
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> KIP
> > >>>>>>>>> proposer, please keep in mind that the voting
has to be done
> > >>>> before
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> deadline in order to be added into the coming
release.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> -- Guozhang
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message