kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] KIP-134: Delay initial consumer group rebalance
Date Mon, 03 Apr 2017 18:40:57 GMT
Hey Onur,

Are you suggesting letting the consumers to hold back on sending
SyncGroupRequest on the first rebalance? I am not sure how exactly that
works. But it looks that having the group coordinator to control the
rebalance progress would be clearer and probably safer than letting the
group members to guess the state of a group. Can you elaborate a little bit
on your idea?

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Onur Karaman <onurkaraman.apache@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Damian.
>
> After reading the discussion thread again, it still doesn't seem like the
> thread discussed the option I mentioned earlier.
>
> From what I had understood from the broker-side vs. client-side config
> debate was that the client-side config from the discussion would cause a
> wire format change, while the client-side config change that I had
> suggested would not.
>
> I just want to make sure we don't accidentally skip past it due to a
> potential misunderstanding.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbejeck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Fenniak <
> > mathieu.fenniak@replicon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > This will be very helpful for me, looking forward to it! :-)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Damian Guy <damian.guy@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start the voting thread on KIP-134:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 134%3A+Delay+initial+consumer+group+rebalance
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Damian
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message