kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Dormant/Inactive KIPs
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:29:59 GMT
Thanks for following up on this Ismael!

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback. I went ahead and moved the mentioned KIPs as well
> as KIP-59, KIP-64, KIP-69 and KIP-76 to a dormant/inactive table. Note that
> this is not a permanent change, people are welcome to move a KIP back to
> the "Under discussion" table if it's not inactive/dormant.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A while back Grant proposed moving inactive/dormant KIPs to a separate
> > table in the wiki. I think this is a good idea as it will make it easier
> > for people to see the KIPs that are actually active. The list that Grant
> > proposed then was:
> >
> > - KIP-6 - New reassignment partition logic for rebalancing (dormant)
> >> - KIP-14 - Tools standardization (dormant)
> >> - KIP-17 - Add HighwaterMarkOffset to OffsetFetchResponse (dormant)
> >> - KIP-18 - JBOD Support (dormant)
> >> - KIP-23 - Add JSON/CSV output and looping options to
> ConsumerGroupCommand
> >> (dormant)
> >> - KIP-27 - Conditional Publish (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-30 - Allow for brokers to have plug-able consensus and meta data
> storage
> >> sub systems (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-39: Pinning controller to broker (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-44 - Allow Kafka to have a customized security protocol (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-46 - Self Healing (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-47 - Add timestamp-based log deletion policy (blocked - by
> KIP-33)
> >>  - KIP-53 - Add custom policies for reconnect attempts to NetworkdClient
> >>  - KIP-58 - Make Log Compaction Point Configurable (blocked - by KIP-33)
> >>  - KIP-61: Add a log retention parameter for maximum disk space usage
> >>    percentage (dormant)
> >>  - KIP-68 Add a consumed log retention before log retention (dormant)
> >
> >
> > KIP-58 was adopted since then and it probably makes sense to add KIP-10
> to
> > the list.
> >
> > Are people OK with this? Feel free to suggest KIPs that should or should
> > not be in the inactive/dormant list.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
>



-- 
Grant Henke
Software Engineer | Cloudera
grant@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message