Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D88200B83 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 04:34:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 68508160ACB; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 02:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B0067160A8C for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 04:34:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 33657 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2016 02:34:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 33645 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2016 02:34:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 02:34:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E98AA1A0036 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.03 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.03 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ=0.75, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzIc_TRLJ5N4 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 02:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5CA985F233 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 02:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id e124so14119945ith.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:34:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=tN+JT9loNzaeKPHbSlafJnNHGRoCPgdvBoANNXvYLa8=; b=bsx12491iR85pt8yNwSPD+DmLibBS8BF0RhRrB/Z9nLRC0/Ed61ytznMtcV1++Qvwx EtcArGqILD/bDJ+hzy9RQljb1J94Z9EDKChCx9r8N62VYWTrlNBxKGF3kBmLcKjkeDDp btqZs43a110dHRVV1msPfG0Emcb2TrZ1pU1Y37xpvCrpNyG+KGaoe0Jj1miNChlCCtJ/ MZeSPErJ0S52YBncm/15jzjhdls03pK5SzBQxcZYD8FJtY9jDnnm4qp12MM/R06Z+Mu8 RsDC/WEQryUEzgZ5s/fvSckloKojBafIwAxRm/osIlVnXlJ/dpsYDu5cD8qUWlM+4715 gssQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tN+JT9loNzaeKPHbSlafJnNHGRoCPgdvBoANNXvYLa8=; b=DX46pmk1XTEFSVFAF708WJ2aVdVbKs8WGWRYm0yp4Yk76L7S0AIsKURqmk2InCnWmf DYLoIwDRzzEGQ9lQbWdxMWxttRnQavEH2zdx+WgrYQJFyeo1+76AX4X7g3VnS/VcNbPE zWqdGy7Ocb9dW6jYMGJX8dLEtCkW4/ueKkGohX6rZskcB7sma5fqALHTDagx0adeHeOK g6jq0EKnnFaPDryzOlWRcrsEqxkGFbXSI95a2mKknbuyQYqN+RIASgV9b6SiWC9RJB/g Lfn36gpLkQaGCno6Y1nX9+bxOQMdz+nxcW0co1I7K/Uy+o2BeXx8zaZxnz34vxy6BLKc 75sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPAx5e/F0VsF/9KZLE4KrHB0Qe9yBJMkQYgv1lizLut9pbQN7VFAtPFgoN7u0/D9koZNcV/2z3dWTnlOQ== X-Received: by 10.107.8.37 with SMTP id 37mr2969511ioi.110.1472870084186; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:34:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ismaelj@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.83.85 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57C65FCE.5010703@gmail.com> References: <57C65FCE.5010703@gmail.com> From: Ismael Juma Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 03:34:03 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _aA9ETeyJonVuSat0z72AYWl0x4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove beta label from the new Java consumer To: dev@kafka.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fb63c2b1941053b914a8b archived-at: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 02:34:50 -0000 --001a113fb63c2b1941053b914a8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jaikiran, Thanks for your feedback. Comments inline. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Personally, I would be OK if the beta label is removed from it if the dev > team is sure the API isn't going to change. I don't know if that's true or > not post 0.10.0.1. The API has been declared stable as of 0.10.0.0. It's worth mentioning that backwards compatible API changes can still happen. > For me the major thing that I think needs to be addressed is these JIRAs > which actually expose some API implementation level issues. Not sure if > solving those issues will involve changes to API itself: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1894 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3540 We think these can be fixed in a backwards compatible manner. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3539 This is for the producer, which hasn't been considered beta since 0.9.0.0. Ismael --001a113fb63c2b1941053b914a8b--