Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org
From: Sriram Subramanian <ram@confluent.io>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)
Message-Id: <7129AD78-BEBF-4032-AB2E-7591F53A6FE5@confluent.io>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 20:09:35 -0700
References: <CAD5tkZZBUkdMedN4eJwjtBXyEzknpdh64hGkz60QvGGCnaGhqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5tkZZBUkdMedN4eJwjtBXyEzknpdh64hGkz60QvGGCnaGhqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
archived-at: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 03:09:43 -0000

+1 binding

> On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id:
>=20
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id
>=20
> As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good first=

> step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ismael
>=20
> [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in
> the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important t=
o
> mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram:
>=20
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAD5tkZb=
Lv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E