kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] KIP-55: Secure quotas for authenticated users
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:01:37 GMT
Ismael, Jun,

Thank you both for the feedback. Have updated the KIP to add dynamic
default quotas for client-id with deprecation of existing static default
properties.


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Jun Rao <jun@confluent.io> wrote:

> Yes, for consistency, perhaps we can allow client-id quota to be configured
> dynamically too and mark the static config in the broker as deprecated. If
> both are set, the dynamic one wins.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > rajinisivaram@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It is actually quite tempting to do the same for client-id quotas as
> > well,
> > > but I suppose we can't break existing users who have configured
> defaults
> > in
> > > server.properties and providing two ways of setting client-id defaults
> > > would be just too confusing.
> > >
> >
> > Using two different approaches for client-id versus user quota defaults
> is
> > also not great. We could deprecate the server.properties default configs
> > for client-id quotas and remove them in the future. In the meantime, we
> > would have to live with 2 level defaults.
> >
> > Jun, what are your thoughts on this?
> >
> > Ismael
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Rajini

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message