kafka-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
Subject Re: [RELEASE UPDATE] Postponing the next release candidates and canceling current vote
Date Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:24:12 GMT
Hi Ewen,

Do you mean issues related to versions (since that should be the only
difference between trunk and 0.10.0)?

Ismael

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <ewen@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Just wanted to throw it out there that still double committing when the
> committer remembers to do so is useful -- daily updates on unit tests (as
> flaky as they can be) and system tests are still useful to have. Better to
> catch any branch-specific issues as early as possible.
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Gwen Shapira <gwen@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > I like the alternative. I'll be happy to do the weekly merges.
> > >
> > > Would be happy to hear other opinions.
> > >
> > > Gwen
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Ismael Juma <ismaelj@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > My concern is that this is error-prone and things can be missed (it
> > > > happened during the 0.9.0.0 release for example). It's a cost worth
> > > paying
> > > > when stabilising but not so clear when accepting major new features.
> > > >
> > > > One alternative would be to just commit to trunk and merge trunk to
> > > 0.10.0
> > > > weekly or something along those lines.
> > > >
> > > > Guozhang, we could delete the branch, but users could be relying on
> it
> > > and
> > > > hence I am not sure we should do that.
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > > On 1 Apr 2016 19:44, "Gwen Shapira" <gwen@confluent.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I prefer keeping the current branch and double-committing for three
> > > > weeks.
> > > > > Not fun, but not end-of-world hard.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless committers object?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Ismael,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shall we "delete" the 0.10.0 branch after going through its
> commits
> > > and
> > > > > > making sure all of them are already in trunk then? I think it
is
> > > doable
> > > > > in
> > > > > > github?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guozhang
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jason Gustafson <
> > jason@confluent.io
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey Gwen,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > KIP-52 would be nice to get in as well. It's a small feature,
> but
> > > > > really
> > > > > > > helpful for Connect users. A patch for the first half is
> already
> > > > > > available,
> > > > > > > though it may need adjustment depending on the discussion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Jason
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ismael Juma <
> ismael@juma.me.uk>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Gwen,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What is the plan for the 0.10.0 branch? Double-committing
> > seems a
> > > > bit
> > > > > > > > wasteful given this change.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 1 Apr 2016 18:54, "Gwen Shapira" <gwen@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey Team Kafka,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Per community discussion, I will not be rolling
out a new
> > > > candidate
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > Monday.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will roll out the next release candidate in
three weeks:
> > > > Friday,
> > > > > > > April
> > > > > > > > > 22.
> > > > > > > > > We can spend Kafka Summit discussing the quality
of the
> > release
> > > > :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The goal is to get it the following improvements:
> > > > > > > > > KIP-4-metadata-update
> > > > > > > > > KIP-35 (version protocol)
> > > > > > > > > KIP-33 (time-based indexes)
> > > > > > > > > KIP-43 (flexible SASL)
> > > > > > > > > KIP-50 (Tiny ACL API change)
> > > > > > > > > KIP-51 (small KafkaConnect API change)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Committers and contributors: Please stay on top
of reviews
> > and
> > > > > > > > discussions.
> > > > > > > > > Lets keep the awesome forward momentum we have
going!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yours,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > > > > > Temporary Release Manager
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ewen
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message