Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12902102.1443788128000.9832.1443788366500@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12902102.1443788128000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12902102.1443788128000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12902102.1443788128936@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-2607) Review `Time` interface and its
 usage
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14941066#comment-14941066 ] 

Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-2607:
------------------------------------

We should probably do this after KAFKA-2606 to make the change simpler.

> Review `Time` interface and its usage
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-2607
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2607
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.2.2
>            Reporter: Ismael Juma
>              Labels: newbie
>
> Two of `Time` interface's methods are `milliseconds` and `nanoseconds` which are implemented in `SystemTime` as follows:
> {code}
>     @Override
>     public long milliseconds() {
>         return System.currentTimeMillis();
>     }
>     @Override
>     public long nanoseconds() {
>         return System.nanoTime();
>     }
> {code}
> The issue with this interface is that it makes it seem that the difference is about the unit (`ms` versus `ns`) whereas it's much more than that:
> https://blogs.oracle.com/dholmes/entry/inside_the_hotspot_vm_clocks
> We should probably change the names of the methods and review our usage to see if we're using the right one in the various places.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)