Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-juddi-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79587 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2008 16:31:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2008 16:31:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 40667 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2008 16:31:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-juddi-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 40649 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2008 16:31:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact juddi-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list juddi-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 40640 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2008 16:31:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:31:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.172.157.102] (HELO smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) (207.172.157.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:31:33 +0000 Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2008 11:31:10 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id PII40150; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:30:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from 24-148-56-77.snb-bsr1.chi-snb.il.cable.rcn.com (HELO faath) ([24.148.56.77]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2008 11:30:03 -0500 From: "Jeff Faath" To: References: <494B9FB5.9080300@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <494B9FB5.9080300@gmail.com> Subject: RE: UUIDGen in jUDDI v3 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:29:53 -0600 Message-ID: <001801c961f7$0667eba0$1337c2e0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Aclh3LTAAwtZdgBATEO9dQu7m9SQ7AAGNRKA Content-Language: en-us X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090209.494BCC11.015C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.7.1/2008-09-02 X-Junkmail-IWF: false X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah...for nostalgia? Actually, there's no harm in keeping them. If you want to add an implementation of UUDIgen that uses the Java generator and make that the default, that's fine. -----Original Message----- From: Kurt T Stam [mailto:kurt.stam@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:21 AM To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: UUIDGen in jUDDI v3 Hi guys, Now that Java has it's own UUID generator do we still need the ones provided in the org.apache.juddi.uuidgen package? I'm thinking not, but if anybody has a good argument why we should keep the ones in there then speak up! --Kurt