juddi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Faath" <jfa...@apache.org>
Subject RE: jUDDI web services
Date Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:48:03 GMT
Yea, we'll probably test CXF out as well.  Right now, I'm working on getting
Axis2 to work which I am close to completing.


From: Anil Saldhana [mailto:anilsaldhana@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:27 PM
To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: jUDDI web services


http://cxf.apache.org/ supports JAX-WS.   

--- On Mon, 12/1/08, Jeff Faath <jfaath@apache.org> wrote:

From: Jeff Faath <jfaath@apache.org>
Subject: RE: jUDDI web services
To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org, anilsaldhana@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 4:19 PM

No, it?s for the v3 release.


We are attempting to make the project WS-stack agnostic by using JAX-WS.
However, given this is an Apache project, we feel it is important to get it
to work with Axis2 and using that as the default runtime.


From: Anil Saldhana [mailto:anilsaldhana@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:42 PM
To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: jUDDI web services


the JAX-WS enabled WS is for your testing?  or juddi testsuite will have it?

If it just for you to proceed, then why not just try to make it JAX-WS and
users will deploy it on their favorite runtime.

--- On Fri, 11/28/08, Jeff Faath <jfaath@apache.org> wrote:

From: Jeff Faath <jfaath@apache.org>
Subject: jUDDI web services
To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org
Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 1:26 PM



I was able to get further along in the investigation of getting the JAX-WS
web services to work with Tomcat and Axis2.  Turns out it wasn?t working
before because Axis2 couldn?t properly deploy the services when classes were
compiled into a jar.  I think there is a way to configure Axis2 to deploy
within a jar, but unfortunately there is a bigger issue.


When trying to bring up the WSDL, I get a namespace conflict issue.  Upon
further investigation, it turns out we are getting hit by a flavor of
WSCOMMONS-377.  And this issue doesn?t look like it?s going to get fixed
anytime soon.


So, I?m not sure where to go from here.  Any suggestions?





View raw message