Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jspwiki-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jspwiki-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5304610133 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96335 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2013 19:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jspwiki-dev-archive@jspwiki.apache.org Received: (qmail 96315 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2013 19:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jspwiki.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jspwiki.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jspwiki.apache.org Received: (qmail 96307 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2013 19:47:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:47:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of harry.metske@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.41] (HELO mail-la0-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:47:36 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id eo20so50006lab.28 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:47:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VctLVFhQs/7h65vG+hbvgFrVCkMF4a3YrglebmOrt98=; b=Fq+uaGyVGjApsa7Yxbo6LueeO55BEFUvkk0jmokx/rrMNaB1oSvxCQmQfrGA5hVilS p9p6eCJ3oQSMeZev1gmNe89QoTzLR+TXx9dK9gODSuAaD0FJELMCq3Te61DtK+HXiGKt JfI4qKWaJVJ//2w/YxtFAFNuz7oFPq9BWJkRNIRRvU+FOXZWcbxytwky6OWVZ5PyhGU6 pBgkTDmMa9WGPQMcshO/7LV+SL2Y/5wOShBU7HOIoa/aFYabO+gh1Xl1n2T5bfUX+F1T QTUuVBGiJ+Cdbx5rcyDEg8yElNdsD6USX+V3D2F702FeCWf2LtD+Mrx9hRYTeIiLJf1U XLkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.20.6 with SMTP id j6mr11790259lae.8.1387396035254; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:47:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.97.33 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:47:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <527D5A1D.80201@gmail.com> <528003AF.7090407@it20one.at> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:47:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kick out 2.9.1 From: Harry Metske To: dev@jspwiki.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d2034d81fa904edd44f6a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013d2034d81fa904edd44f6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Juan Pablo, first, thanks for all your efforts, I too appreciate ! I have been testing the trunk, the only thing I could find until now is every 30 seconds a couple of these in the jspwiki.log: 2013-12-18 20:44:11,954 ERROR org.apache.wiki.WatchDog - Stack is empty! java.util.EmptyStackException at java.util.Stack.peek(Stack.java:102) at org.apache.wiki.WatchDog.check(WatchDog.java:264) at org.apache.wiki.WatchDog.access$300(WatchDog.java:52) at org.apache.wiki.WatchDog$WatchDogThread.backgroundTask(WatchDog.java:371) at org.apache.wiki.WikiBackgroundThread.run(WikiBackgroundThread.java:118) I'm investigating it currently... kind regards, Harry On 18 December 2013 02:00, Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez < juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > quick note, as it's nearly 2.00am here; done almost all steps required to > publish all artifacts on a staging repo, which the vote is going to be ru= n > against. Currently blocked by a nexus timeout on closing the staging repo= , > progress can be followed at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7105. > Once this is fixed (hopefully by tomorrow..), the vote for 2.10.0 release > will be called. > > > br, > juan pablo > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < > siegfried.goeschl@it20one.com> wrote: > > > Hi Juan Pablo, > > > > I will play around with the current trunk :-) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > > > On 16 Dec 2013, at 22:03, Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez < > > juanpablo.santos@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > just finished doing a big bunch of pending refactors prior to releasi= ng > > > 2.10. We should be able to end up with all the artifacts on maven > central > > > too (once the vote+release passes), and use a staged repository[#1] t= o > > vote > > > instead of uploading to somewhere at people.a.o > > > > > > There are only a couple of points remaining: updating UPGRADING and > > > ReleaseNotes and ensuring all the prerequisites of [#1] are met. > > Hopefully, > > > they will be done between today and tomorrow. In the meantime, this i= s > a > > > call for testing current trunk, which is going to be most likely > 2.10.0. > > > I've tried to test all the recent commits (and will continue to do so= me > > > more testing), but for sure the more people looking into it before > voting > > > the release, the better. > > > > > > > > > thanks + br, > > > juan pablo > > > > > > > > > [#1]: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < > > > siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi folks, > > >> > > >> IMHO it is important to get the release out > > >> > > >> * users are looking at project activity - there are many different > wikis > > >> out there ... > > >> > > >> * are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better hav= e > a > > >> small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 mont= hs > > down > > >> the road (which might get delayed later on) > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Siegfried Goeschl > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case= , > > the > > >>> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we relea= se > > >>> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest > release, > > >>> because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those > classes > > >>> back > > >>> to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated > > classes) > > >>> or > > >>> just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2, > because I > > >>> was > > >>> having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the > > managers > > >>> for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding > > these > > >>> last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me. > > >>> > > >>> As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to > deploy > > to > > >>> repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is > > done, > > >>> I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> br, > > >>> juan pablo > > >>> > > >>> [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just > > without > > >>>> "incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque wa= y > of > > >>>> doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicat= or > > of > > >>>> software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of = us > > >>>> right > > >>>> now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon > with > > >>>> me), > > >>>> busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation. > > >>>> > > >>>> Glen > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ? > > >>>>> The latter has more issues fixed... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> regards, > > >>>>> Harry > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 8 November 2013 08:41, J=C3=BCrgen Weber wrot= e: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodr=C3=ADguez" < > > >>>>>> juanpablo.santos@gmail.com>: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 too > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiExceptio= n > > >>>>>>> (deleted > > >>>>>>> in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two > similar > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> changes, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.= 0 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the > release > > on > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ASF's > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> br, > > >>>>>>> juan pablo > > >>>>>>> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" > > >>>>>>> escribi=C3=B3: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 5 November 2013 16:50, J=C3=BCrgen Weber w= rote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems > not a > > >>>>>>>> lot > > >>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>> going on. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator. > > >>>>>>>>> Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>> Juergen > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > --089e013d2034d81fa904edd44f6a--