From user-return-46741-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@jmeter.apache.org Thu May 3 19:58:51 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D135D180625 for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 19:58:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2574 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2018 17:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 2563 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2018 17:58:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2018 17:58:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1AC3A1A0072 for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:58:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.49 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwP6CvLMsmRN for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from internetallee.de (internetallee.de [81.169.162.220]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3FC1D5F5DF for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (p5488946F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.136.148.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internetallee.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2E2DE2070B for ; Thu, 3 May 2018 19:58:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Load test throughput cut by half in Jmeter 4.0 To: user@jmeter.apache.org References: From: Felix Schumacher Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 19:58:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB Am 03.05.2018 um 19:39 schrieb Walker Mellema: > Our load tests recently began running at half the normal rate. Response > times were slightly longer, but the requests per minute had dropped to half > the expected rate. We're running Java 8. > > Our load tests were written in Jmeter 3.3. After some investigation we > found that opening a Jmeter 3.3 file with Jmeter 4.0 and saving it > (converting it to 4.0) was the culprit. The test runs at twice the rpm in > Jmeter 3.3 vs. the SAME jmx file saved in 4.0 > > Where would I report a bug like this? If you can share the test plan, you could file a bug in bugzilla as described on http://jmeter.apache.org/issues.html or you could discuss the elements used in the testplan here. Regards,  Felix > > Thanks. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org