Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97528200D51 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:04:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 95CE8160C0F; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DF472160BFD for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:04:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20257 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2017 04:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 20243 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2017 04:04:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CB955C122C for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.098 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlVqvKZzWsr2 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (mail-wr0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2E6875FDB2 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id a63so16386903wrc.12 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:04:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3EAHt0rlkCI23OBTb3tx2cNPYCJH/MWFyquRJQC9Mpk=; b=O7YcPI7Qu7MHTiUBlB44q/kYNY96D1xfDSqfyH+/ezarX/cB4OQqzRM//sMkN3V6qq 7e23hCRdundRUGzsAuGgwBKwbAJ46Kt318Jm9sdbCYVfIWqHkCfXgDq/CKuibaYPQ/Wg g9BFiScyQ4qeFcwhJjbHKA0K1uRMA8LQgNhU0Cj1aGzOPe6K+3oOChtSlGgWUu6+xKNq QOVdsGz+oyIMkIkHFyfFQS8JuMLdqxHdTNPxtucMP09KW/JypUaFZtj3vyaiZ6565W+h Mxi4L5KhelSngcf9SvfxM9w1JoE4o97OseqT+6CvESVNhmckiBpTMtiW+/NU0uHNiv45 MWeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3EAHt0rlkCI23OBTb3tx2cNPYCJH/MWFyquRJQC9Mpk=; b=ZKwFuucdAhTZN2coiQGA5ngcRfxvlAyz/2TYDK9mnU061KpJ28ye6x4jAMBZJK4+ai iypBFTw3OLQ0LFup+Ils6LWP5m2TIJP8hgFu5UI3t4kSG33AL12aoOrJN7l358cF2XiR AvmDrmUNhCSPlokzmlB4fOzW19paR23Me4MPUh/avY4NXB/p7adp3LRh5Wifgaw2wHnm p7ZPbNV0XJdn1xWDI9fOsVShbHRFb42DBSVxJpjLtWSkNM8xAloZOhC45rk+4nuZb3iR ApQgRLm7CQh6Nc26NxVezMXjEAZaD+NVWCxBZvYuaK+kDBhcwXaXDZQkmb50MS9/YHc0 3EhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4Q4yuIqCnNJI7tX8fFKFZ/3nAwStV9Gg8Z4rSItAxxAoJuDF+A bKZkwYVRB04pIrdkBnpikX43o8XXybjzuNxz93ox8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYc/FA00lu7zG28YLyt6CfLXqAoddzHOJdRjJgTbA2t38jwr5KfvdbPUweBs3b54vgqNUyADQpOwFabXHu71nI= X-Received: by 10.223.128.3 with SMTP id 3mr18405802wrk.196.1511409843076; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:04:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.156.139 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:04:02 -0800 (PST) From: Malith Jayasinghe Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:34:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Issues in JMETER Dashboard Latency Percentile Calculations To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c069734ce8109055e9e86b2" archived-at: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:04:13 -0000 --94eb2c069734ce8109055e9e86b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear All, We have been using JMETER extensively for performance testing. All our performance reports are generated using the JMETER Dashboard. Recently, we have found out that there is an issue in the JMETER dashboard's *latency percentile calculation. * There is a significant difference in the actual percentile values and the values shown in the dashboard. We have verified this using "R" and in fact, the values shown the JMETER aggregate report are correct. The values that appear in the JMETER Dashboard are not. We understand that JMETER Dashboard may be using a different algorithm (approximation) for percentile calculation. However, the problem is that that latency percentiles values calculated using this algorithm are not accurate (at least for certain scenarios). We have had a case where the Dashboard showing a 95% percentile value 1000 ms. However, the correct value was 321 ms. The accuracy of percentile values are of utmost importance to us and we would kindly ask you to look into this issue and release a patch if possible. If you can implement the same algorithm used in the aggregate report within the dashboard that will resolve this issue. Thanks Malith Jayasinghe --94eb2c069734ce8109055e9e86b2--