jmeter-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deepak Shetty <shet...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Timers, and how they affect results?
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:30:49 GMT
Hi
it doesn't increase the response time recorded by the Sampler (except
transaction controllers which has a checkbox)
http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/glossary.html

regards
deepak

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Pravesh Prajapati <
prajapati.pravesh@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Deepak,
> Do you mean that adding timers will not increase the response time?
>
> Regards.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Deepak Shetty <shettyd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > assuming you are referring to the response time of each sampler (and not
> > throughput) - I do not see the behavior you are seeing
> > Jmeter does not include the delay in the sampler times . However
> Throughput
> > for e.g. in say Summary Report would include the delay in its
> calculation-
> > so youll need to specify what and how you are measuring the time
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Onl <onlineforumsinfo@nyc.rr.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Should jmeter include timer delays in the results?
> > > My tests has a Uniform Random Timer at the thread-level, such that:
> > >
> > > THREAD_ONE
> > >    UNIFORM RANDOM TIMER (max 100ms)
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 1
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 2
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 3
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 4
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 5
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 6
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 7
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 8
> > >    HTTP SAMPLE 9 ...
> > >  (hundreds of samplers)
> > >
> > > Thread count is 100, rampup is 100.
> > >
> > >
> > > WITHOUT TIMER DELAY
> > > ====================
> > >
> > > 3.696, 1.709, 2.447 (recycle tomcat)
> > > 3.801, 1.670, 2.488 (recycle tomcat)
> > >
> > > WITH TIMER DELAY
> > > ================
> > > 3.678, 2.945, 5.305   (recycle tomcat)
> > > 3.425, 2.974, 5.709
> > >
> > >    (time is in seconds)
> > >
> > > It was my understanding that timers are not included in the results.
> But
> > > consistently,
> > > my tests with the timers are nearly double the time than those without
> > > after the first run.
> > >
> > > What is going on here?
> > > Why is the time for the 2nd and 3rd iteration double?
> > > Is there a way to exclude timer delays from the results?
> > > Is there a flaw in my process?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pravesh prajapati.
> Mob:-9702600170
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message